The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

Notes from Ralph Maltby Thinking on The Edge

Hey, this stuff is fun. If you have some brainy ideas I would love to receive them. Just post them in the comments below. Who knows, they may show up in a column like this someday.

Click here to get Ralph’s Insider Emails

Back to Article Discussions

Article Discussion

  • 2:26PM - Aug 27, 2008RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #9
    Report This

    Easy technology is supplemented by longer shafts, rendering improvement obsolete, and maintaining an artificial ceiling of difficulty on the average golfer who doesn’t know better.

    Driver technology allows a 4’ surface at the very bottom f the face, and we can all put the gap wedge back in our bag because we can use the trusty 1 wood on the green. Clubhouses everywhere are marred by ballmarks from golfers who putt with a driver and miss their birdie putt by 1 inch on the 18th green.

    People slowly come around to the fact that “standard length, loft, and lie” top of the line clubs can easily be assembled in your basement with a dremmel, some tape, solvent, epoxy, and parts.

    Stronger shafts and epoxies allow hosels shrink down to almost nothing, allowing the lowest possible center of gravity on the clubhead

  • 1:23PM - Sep 13, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #8
    Report This

    Try as many different types of clubs that fit you if you don’t like yours, and oh yes ask the advise of your PGA Professional for help.

  • 1:25PM - Sep 9, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #7
    Report This

    Hey Ralph, I have a question for you. I have read about the “clone” market and how it compares to the top companies like Titleist, Taylor Made, Mizuno, and so on. I want to know your opinion on the matter and more importantly, how you feel your clubs compare to the big golf companies. I have played them all and honestly see no difference in quality between your clubs and theirs. If anything, I prefer your clubs because they feel solid and have a much better game improvement aspect to them. It seems like most of the blades out today are the same and focus on the same type of player/swing. Your MMB iron focuses on a wider range of players/ swings and will improve anyone’s game. I don’t catagorize your clubs “clones” and only use your clubs because of the science and classifications you use in your club design. My target demographic is the average player trying to improve, on a budget. The guy willing to spend $900 on an iron set is sold on the the name and not the technology behind it.

  • 8:55AM - Apr 24, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #6
    Report This

    Capoeira, I am still working on getting a model to test so I do not have an answer for you. I should have it soon.

  • 8:45AM - Apr 24, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #5
    Report This

    • capoeira

    • capoeira
    • Guest

    Good morning. I wonder if you have determined the (VERY USEFUL) MPF o the Nickent 3DX hybrid iron set? Thank you!

  • 9:46AM - Apr 10, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #4
    Report This

    Tom, unless the shaft is modified by trimming from the tip or using a stronger flex, a lenghtened club will feel and be more flexible. This I assume you already knew. You would not want to purposely make a shaft more flexible by lengthening a club. However, sometimes this makes the shaft perform even better and particularly so if the golfer had the shaft a bit too stiff to start with. This is something to experiment with to get the proper shaft fit. Second Question: I have heard of Jack but I am not all that familiar with his teachings and therefore cannot comment. Tom, I too have seen Moe Norman hit golf balls and play. He had ball striking abilities that I have never seen before. Too bad more golfers never had the chance to see his talent in person.

  • 10:15PM - Apr 9, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #3
    Report This

    • tom dahl

    • tom dahl
    • Guest

    Two separate but related questions. If you make overlength clubs should you also make them more flexible on purpose? And, given your stature in the club design business I am sure you have heard of Jack Kuykendall. Do you have any opinion on his golf motion and what do you think of his new Twins clubs?

    Tom

    PS…I walked about 12 rounds watching Moe Norman play and also saw 3 of his exhibitions over 15+ years. It’s hard to describe the feeling if you have never seen Moe hit balls. I am currently using the Kuykendall techniques (single axis) and I love it.

  • 1:39PM - Apr 8, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #2
    Report This

    Rex, the Titlest 735CM iron is 648 points and in the Game Improvement category. This is a very good iron with a very low vertical center of gravity at .638”. This is a good pick and the highest playability of all the latest Titlest irons. Titlest has made some very good design changes in their recent forgings. First, they have shortened the hosel to move the center of gravity lower. Also, this allowed them to move the center of gravity into the middle of the face vs. their heel location of the past.

  • 8:27AM - Apr 7, 2007RE: The Future of Golf And Its Equipment

    #1
    Report This

    • Rex Janssen

    • Rex Janssen
    • Guest

    What is the MPF of the Titleist Forged 735 CM irons?

Post Comment