The Maltby Reporter - Volume 1.5

This excerpt is a continuation of “The Maltby Reporter – Volume 1” from a previous article in the series entitled “The Scoop on Comparing Playability of Two New Iron Designs”. To read this article first, click here.

The Scoop on Iron Head Loft

We have referred to “normal” and “stronger” iron head lofts in reference to the new #6 irons we have been measuring to bring MPF up to date. This subject needs further discussion to put loft into perspective regarding the entire set of irons.

Get rid of clubs that don’t complement your game.

When referring to so-called “normal” lofts for irons today we mean that the lofts of the irons are very close to the following: #3 iron = 20º, #4 iron = 23º, #5 iron = 27º, #6 iron = 31º, #7 iron = 35º, #8 iron = 39º, #9 iron = 43º, PW = 47º, SW = 56º. Note that this gives us a 9º gap between the PW and the SW.

There are a number of iron models introduced today that have stronger lofts. The actual lofts vary a little from manufacturer to manufacturer, but the following is fairly close to a “stronger” loft set; #3 iron = 19º, #4 iron = 22º, #5 iron = 25º, #6 iron 28º, #7 iron 32º, #8 iron = 36º, #9 iron = 40º, PW = 44º. Note that this gives us a 12º gap between the PW and the SW. This assumes the SW is 56º. I think you start to see the problem of the larger gap between the PW and SW and that it must be addressed when buying a set with this type of loft pattern. Some manufacturers of stronger loft sets are increasing the gap in lofts between the #7, #8 and #9 irons to 5º vs. 4º to reduce the gap between the PW and SW. This approach only messes up the normal even progression of distances from club to club. Also, some manufacturers are strengthening the SW in the set to have 55º or even 54º loft. I do not like either of these band-aid approaches.

Basically I like to look at the loft thing this way. The lofts that we call “normal” today have been strengthened over the years to become the new modern standard. The gradual strengthening mostly occurred as each manufacturer was trying to out distance the other in their advertising and/or promotional claims. If you think about it, these new lofts actually made the modern #5 iron into a long iron vs. a middle iron that it once was. So now we have the #3, #4, and #5 as long irons, the #6, #7 and #8 are the middle irons (the #8 iron of old was a short iron) and the #9 and PW are short irons.

The 6 iron is now really a “long iron”.

This now leads us into discussing the “stronger” loft irons. First of all, the #6 iron now becomes a long iron, so the #3, #4, #5 and #6 are now the long irons, the #7, #8 and #9 are now the middle irons and the PW is the only short iron in the set. What the manufactures are actually doing is leaving the overall length of the club alone (most of the time) and strengthening the lofts. Another way to say this is that loft wise, the #6 iron becomes a #5 iron; the #5 iron becomes a #4 iron and so on. The only difference to this statement is that the individual club lengths have not changed. The new stronger lofted #6 iron is still the same length as before thus it is a ½” shorter #5 iron in actuality when it is compared to so called normal iron lofts.

There is another thing to be aware of regarding the new stronger lofted sets of irons. I have heard from the manufacturers and read a number of golf writings that the lofts on some of the new irons need to be stronger because they hit the ball so much higher because of very low centers of gravity. This can sometimes be a true statement with a very low actual vertical center of gravity. The problem occurs when the vertical center of gravity is not all that low but the clubs lofts are reduced anyway. Be aware of this and make sure to do your homework on the lofts of any set of irons you are buying. Always try them out first. Keep this in mind also, if you happen to get a shaft that is too stiff for you or even too tip stiff a shaft profile and you also have these new reduced loft irons, you will probably have a more difficult time getting the ball airborne and hitting it consistently solid.

Here is what I am getting at in a round about way. Most of us probably agree that even with “normal” lofted sets of irons we would be better off buying only #4 through PW sets and have the #3 iron available as a separate club if needed. Now, with the “stronger” lofted sets we can drop the #4 iron and make the set makeup #5 through PW. Remember that we just pointed out that the club lengths stayed the same. This means that our new #5 through PW starts out with the loft of a #4 iron but the length of a #5 iron. The hitting distance difference between each iron in the set varies from golfer to golfer but we can pretty much say that it is 10 to 15 yards between each club. This difference is mostly created by two club specifications; the loft and the clubs length. Testing has shown that approximately half of the distance difference is from the change in loft from club to club (3º to 4º). The other half of the distance difference occurs from each clubs incremental change in length (usually ½’).

Find a Maltby Certified Fitting Expert to help fit you to the right irons.

When we take all this loft and length stuff into consideration when buying a set of irons, we need to consider alternatives regarding additional wedges and/or additional hybrids or fairway metals. The purchase does not stop with the iron set but gives us the opportunity to decide how everything fits into the overall set make-up regarding the type game we play. In my opinion, set make-up is not evaluated thoroughly enough for every golfer. Remember set make-up is an important fitting variable and can have a huge effect on the type shots a golfer plays and also how well a golfer scores. Getting rid of clubs that are hard to hit or possibly not needed and substituting them with easier to hit clubs that complement the rest of the set is a big confidence booster that will definitely help any golfers’ game.

Thank you for reading Volume 1 of The Maltby Reporter – more to come soon!

Click here to get Ralph’s Insider Emails

Recent Comments

  • Ralph Maltby
  • 09:33 AM - September 23, 2008

Jack, my rule of thumb is to never put more than 4 grams of weight in the tip end of the shaft. The playability suffers too much as you add weight beyond this point.

  • Jack Butler
  • 08:27 AM - September 22, 2008

Ralph, Golfworks offers tip weights in 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 gram increments. Do you consider any of these weights excessive? How far in toward the heel would the horizontal center be offset if one were to put say, a 10 gram tip weight into a 240 gram 3-iron head? I'm planning on pulling the shafts on a clubpak of Recoil RDMs I built about a year ago and inserting 6, 8, and 10 gram tip weights to get them up around D1 swingweight. I built the set with the 5-iron at 37 3/4 inches and the swing weights came in around C7, C8. Thank you.

  • Ralph Maltby
  • 10:18 AM - September 19, 2008

Jack Butler, excessive tip weighting to achieve a certain swingweight will add weight in such a manner as to shift the center of gravity of the clubhead toward the added weight. So, if the C.G. is in the middle of the face in the original design, it will now shift toward the hosel or heel area when a shaft tip weight is added. The mass and dimensional qualities of a clubhead determine its basic playability level (MPF), so redistributing these qualities by adding weight in the wrong place will negatively affect the playability. The proper way to add weight is to place it either in the center of face or equidistant on either side of the face and as low as possible in the clubhead.

  • Jack Butler
  • 02:49 PM - September 18, 2008

Ralph, you caught my attention with your comment at the bottom of the paragraph that tip weighting is not good. Please explain. Thanks.

  • Ralph Maltby
  • 10:45 AM - August 19, 2007

Frank, a 150 yard 7 iron says that you need stiff flex shafts. If you are a smooth swinger and hit the ball relatively straight with good consistency, you could play regular flex shafts. The caviat here is that you do not want to hit the ball too high or with less directional control. If however the regular flex shaft helps you by getting the ball a little higher in the air and you do hit it straight, your hits will feel more solid on slightly off center hits than with the stiff flex. Also, the face will close a little more from the softer flex shaft. Regarding the clones, some are similar in playability to the originals and some are far worse. A very big problem with clones is that many of them have faces which are not even close to being flat. Take any straight edge and lay it horizontally on the face and check yours out. Curved faces can cause big problems. Another problem with some clones is that their head weights are sometimes very light causing the assembler to put quite a bit of tip slugging (added lead weight) in the hosel. This is not good also. Hopefully, this is a start at finding out if it's you or your equipment or a little of both.

Go to Article Discussion

Putting: Is It Art Or Science?

Mass and dimensional properties of the putter will cause even the most talented golfers to struggle.

more

Find The Shaft For You

A simple tool to help you find your shaft MPF.

more

Putter Fitting And Tune-Up Worksheet

Check your putter specifications.

more

Putter Impact Decal Procedures And Analysis

View Ralph’s template for Decal analysis.

more